I didn't know there were cables spanning the Pacific! That's a lot of water. The description of the cable is amazing as well. 14 cm thick with several layers of steel wire mesh guarding a narrow (like, 1 cm) wide fiber optic core that actually carries the data. It would take some heavy equipment to break that.
Friday, February 1
Information Super-Highway
I didn't know there were cables spanning the Pacific! That's a lot of water. The description of the cable is amazing as well. 14 cm thick with several layers of steel wire mesh guarding a narrow (like, 1 cm) wide fiber optic core that actually carries the data. It would take some heavy equipment to break that.
Video Game Tax in New Mexico
New Mexico Proposes Video Game Tax to Punish Staying Indoors
Joseph Henchman says:
More ambiguously though, I agree with the philosophy of government given by Mr. Henchman. While it's appealing to think that Parks'n Rec would be paid for by Gamestop, as a service, parks and rec should be paid for by people that use it, not by people that don't. People should want more outdoor activities, government should try to 'make them want' more outdoor activities.
Hat Tip to Joseph Henchman @ Tax Policy Blog
But a coalition of groups, led by the Rio Grande chapter of the Sierra Club, is sold on the idea that outdoor education programs can inspire children in a way that video games and television cannot.
The coalition wants state lawmakers to create a No Child Left Inside Fund with a 1 percent tax on TVs, video games and video game equipment. The fund would help pay for outdoor education throughout the state.
Joseph Henchman says:
The fundamental purpose of taxes is to raise revenue necessary for programs, not micromanage people's decisions with subsidies and penalties. If a tax targeting video games is justified, it should be on the basis of actual negative externalities, not the whims of social engineers picking things they don't like at random.For myself, I can say without ambiguity that I vastly prefer this type of policy to efforts to ban certain types of video game content. One advantage is that a direct tax creates a disincentive to hurt the industry.
More ambiguously though, I agree with the philosophy of government given by Mr. Henchman. While it's appealing to think that Parks'n Rec would be paid for by Gamestop, as a service, parks and rec should be paid for by people that use it, not by people that don't. People should want more outdoor activities, government should try to 'make them want' more outdoor activities.
Hat Tip to Joseph Henchman @ Tax Policy Blog
Labels:
Economics,
fun,
News,
Policy,
taxes,
technology,
Unites States,
video games
Freedom in the Image of God
Freedom in the Image of God
I just wrote this, it has something of the tone of a rant. And although I'm still in the same mood that I was when I wrote it, I think I like it.
I just wrote this, it has something of the tone of a rant. And although I'm still in the same mood that I was when I wrote it, I think I like it.
To be truly free, is to accurately be the living breathing image of an all knowing, all powerful God that loves the people around him so much, he is willing to sacrifice his own flesh to help those people become more like himself.
Wednesday, January 30
Tuesday, January 29
Educational Duties to the Future
Video clip of Richard Dreyfus on liberal education.
Any Questions?
Hat Tip to Brian Holler at Thinking on the Margin.
Any Questions?
Hat Tip to Brian Holler at Thinking on the Margin.
Monday, January 28
Immigration Regulations

On the other side of this argument are the well reasoned arguments of Samuel Huntington in Who We Are. My personal perspective is more along the lines of how immigration restriction restricts freedom, here explained by Don Boudreaux.
Huntington's point about culture is true, immigrants will change a culture, and ideal characteristics that attracted the immigrants are likely to be watered down or eliminated. But immigration is the very freedom that allowed those settlers to create this nation in the first place and removing that freedom seems very wrong to me. A wall on the border, for it's own sake seems like a perfectly reasonable project to me, but not for the purposes of keeping immigrants out. The great wall of china was built for real security reasons, I have no problem with that. I'd support the wall, if open immigration were in place on a very permanent basis.
Hat tip to Ampersand at Alas, a blog.
Labels:
Academia,
Economics,
Freedom,
Immigration,
Japan,
Policy,
Unites States
Sunday, January 27
Friday, January 25
Anon vs. Scientology
A hacker group called Anonymous, has declared war on the 'church' of Scientology. So far they seem to have successfully executed a DoS attack on the Scientology website, and a prank on the church's hotline.
Various Media outlets have picked up on this.
Australia Wired The Register National Post
Anon has responded to media coverage of the 'war.'
I fight the urge to support Anon in this solely because of the quality of their videos. But really I don't see what they're going to do. They can't cause any real harm by pulling pranks like a DoS or phone line redirects. They'd really have to cause financial messes, like stealing money from the 'church' and sending it to the FBI, then send an email politely asking them to spend the money investigating the 'church.' That would be impressive, because it's really hard to do. So until they show themselves to actually be serious in this, I have to write them off as a bunch of kids playing important on YouTube.
Various Media outlets have picked up on this.
Australia Wired The Register National Post
Anon has responded to media coverage of the 'war.'
I fight the urge to support Anon in this solely because of the quality of their videos. But really I don't see what they're going to do. They can't cause any real harm by pulling pranks like a DoS or phone line redirects. They'd really have to cause financial messes, like stealing money from the 'church' and sending it to the FBI, then send an email politely asking them to spend the money investigating the 'church.' That would be impressive, because it's really hard to do. So until they show themselves to actually be serious in this, I have to write them off as a bunch of kids playing important on YouTube.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)